Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Filip Misolic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cerundolo vs Misolic analysis and find out who is favored!
Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Filip Misolic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cerundolo 0 - 0 Misolic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cerundolo has won 50.22% of points on his second serve, while Misolic has won 48.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cerundolo, in recent form, has won 54.12% of his opponent's second serve points, while Misolic has won 47.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.82% and 30.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cerundolo has saved 51.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Misolic has saved 61.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cerundolo has won 47.62% of matches played (W/L 30/ 33), with Misolic winning 50% (W/L 26/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cerundolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 206/ 120), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Misolic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 123/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Cerundolo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19), where as Misolic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.83% of matches (W/L 13/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cerundolo has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.78 while Misolic has played against players with an average rank of 239.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cerundolo has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Misolic has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cerundolo has converted 45.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Misolic has converted 42.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cerundolo 0 - 0 Misolic
167
Rank
79
High
22
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
201
Rank
126
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
61% (215-137)
Career Total W/L
62% (149-92)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
33% (6-12)
$351,575
Career Prize Money
$233,040
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Juan Manuel Cerundolo | Filip Misolic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 33% (6/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (35/33) | 38% (16/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (310/298) | 48% (199/218) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 52% (14/13) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 73 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 86 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:48 | 1:46:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 252.28 | 253.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1164/1843) | 56% (748/1342) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (733/1164) | 72% (537/748) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (341/679) | 48% (285/594) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (97/212) | 45% (45/100) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (807/1914) | 36% (464/1288) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (10/10) | 38% (6/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 33% (6/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 65% (17/11) | 56% (9/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 35% (17/6) | 44% (9/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 11% (9/1) |
Juan Manuel Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(2) 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Francisco Comesana
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sandro Kopp
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Gabriel Diallo
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
77%
(
74 of
96)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Federico Salomone
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Travaglia
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Misolic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Filip Misolic
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Ugo Blanchet
39%
(
35 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
41%
(
32 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Filip Misolic
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Filip Misolic
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Michael Geerts
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Billy Harris
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Filip Misolic
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cerundolo Vs Misolic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
